Soft assertions
A soft assertion is a type of assertion that doesn't short-circuit your test case when it fails. Instead, all failed soft assertions are reported at the end of the test run at once.
🦉 The concept of soft assertions isn't new, and you can find it in other programming languages. Somehow, it's not as widespread in JavaScript, which is a shame we will try collectively to correct.
You can turn any assertion into a soft assertion in Vitest by replacing
expect()
with expect.soft()
:test('cancels the user subscription', () => {
const user = new User()
user.subscribe(new UnlimitedPlan())
expect(user.subscription.name).toBe('Unlimited')
expect(user.subscription.kind).toBe('yearly')
expect(user.subscription.state).toBe('active')
expect(user.subscription.endsAt).toBeUndefined()
expect.soft(user.subscription.name).toBe('Unlimited')
expect.soft(user.subscription.kind).toBe('yearly')
expect.soft(user.subscription.state).toBe('active')
expect.soft(user.subscription.endsAt).toBeUndefined()
user.cancelSubscription()
expect(user.subscription.state).toBe('cancelled')
expect(user.subscription.endsAt).toBe('2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z')
expect.soft(user.subscription.state).toBe('cancelled')
expect.soft(user.subscription.endsAt).toBe('2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z')
})
In the case of the subscription service test, both assertions around the current subscription state and the cancelled state reflect the same expectation that requires multiple criteria to be fully expressed.
💡 If you imagine regular assertions asawait new Promise(expectation)
, then soft assertions areawait Promise.allSettled(...expectations)
.
With the soft assertions in place, I can now see all failed assertions after the test run is complete:
FAIL src/user.test.ts > cancels the user subscription
AssertionError: expected 'active' to be 'cancelled' // Object.is equality
Expected: "cancelled"
Received: "active"
❯ src/user.test.ts:24:39
22| user.cancelSubscription()
23|
24| expect.soft(user.subscription.state).toBe('cancelled')
| ^
25| expect.soft(user.subscription.endsAt).toBe('2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z')
26| })
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯[1/2]⎯
FAIL src/user.test.ts > cancels the user subscription
AssertionError: expected '2025-12-01T00:00:00.000Z' to be '2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z' // Object.is equality
Expected: "2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z"
Received: "2025-12-01T00:00:00.000Z"
❯ src/user.test.ts:25:40
23|
24| expect.soft(user.subscription.state).toBe('cancelled')
25| expect.soft(user.subscription.endsAt).toBe('2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z')
| ^
26| })
27|
This gives me an overview of the entire system, not just the first failed assertion. Equipped with that knowledge, I can fix the issue as a whole instead of solving each failed assertion individually.
public cancel() {
if (this.state !== 'active') {
return
}
this.state = 'cancelled'
const today = new Date()
today.setUTCDate(1)
today.setUTCMonth(
today.getUTCMonth() + 1 > 11 ? 0 : today.getUTCMonth() + 1,
)
if (today.getUTCMonth() === 0) {
today.setUTCFullYear(today.getUTCFullYear() + 1)
}
this.endsAt = today.toISOString()
}
When to use soft assertions
Soft assertions are tremendously useful because they give you more information on test failures. But that doesn't mean you should make all assertions soft. In fact, that would be quite a disasterous thing to do.
Both regular and soft assertions are valuable, and they are valuable precisely due to the difference in their behavior. Below, I will give you a few examples so you would know when to reach out for each.
Regular assertions | Soft assertions |
---|---|
Use to express a hard expectation. In other words, if this assertion fails, there's no reason to run the rest of the test. | Use to express a single, non-exclusive criteria in a compound expectation. In other words, if this assertion fails, there is more to this expectation to paint a full picture. |
Regular assertions are your hard stops in a test, which also makes all such assertions dependent on each other.
// This assertion must pass...
expect(one).toBe(two)
// ...in order for this to run, which must pass...
expect(three).toBe(four)
// ...in order for this to run.
expect(five).toBe(six)
This allows you to create a waterfall of expectations.
Soft assertions, on the other hand, have no such dependency and will run in parallel. This characteristic makes them a great choice for expressing compound expectations or expectations toward multiple, independent states.
renderIntialState()
await transition(nextState)
// In this example, soft assertions are used to describe
// multiple criteria of the same expectation.
expect.soft(state.one).toBe('this')
expect.soft(state.two).toBe('that')
await goto(page.url)
await interact()
// Here, we are expressing multiple expectations toward DIFFERENT
// states (in this case, different elements on the page).
// The heading and the button aren't interconnected and should be
// asserted independently.
expect.soft(headingElement).toHaveTextContent('Welcome to my site!')
expect.soft(buttonElement).toHaveTextContent('Subscribe to my newsletter')